Feed

List Price: ~~$7.99~~
Price: $4.18
You Save: $3.81 (48%)

Feed (Newsflesh, Book 1)

List Price: ~~$9.99~~
Price: $5.52
You Save: $4.47 (45%)

Deadline (Newsflesh, Book 2)

List Price: ~~$9.99~~
Price: $4.89
You Save: $5.10 (51%)

Feed

List Price: $7.99

Blackout (The Newsflesh Trilogy)

List Price: ~~$9.99~~
Price: $9.99

Feed

List Price: $0.99

Feed

Feed (Newsflesh Trilogy)

List Price: $7.99

How to Feed a Family of 4 or More for Less than $200 a Month

Countdown: A Newsflesh Novella

List Price: $2.99

Extended Breast-Feeding: Is It More Common Than We Think?

20.05.12

It’s hard to ignore the cover of this week’s TIME magazine . There’s Jamie Lynne Grumet, looking every bit the supermodel in super-skinny jeans, ballet flats and a strappy tank top with the neckline tugged down to make way for…her nearly 4-year-old son. He’s breast-feeding.

Over the last few months, breast-feeding has grabbed headlines as moms have staged nationwide nurse-ins to draw attention to their right to breast-feed in public. Mothers with babes in arms have collectively bared their breasts in Target stores; they’ve had their infants latch on at Facebook’s headquarters and at the state capitol in Georgia.

But the campaign for greater acceptance of nursing in public — and all those detractors who recoil when they see a mother feeding a baby just as her body is programmed to do — pales next to the startling image of Grumet feeding a boy who clearly doesn’t need breast milk to thrive. Or does he?

( MORE: Behind the Cover: Are You Mom Enough? )

Source: TIME

ICCC6 live feed again today | Watts Up With That?

by Anthony Watts

(E.g. alarmists demanding skeptics prove there is no warming, rather than providing quantitative evidence of anthropogenic causation of global warming.)

Post modern science – my opinion is as good as yours – with no reference to evidence.

Carter showed seven major “black swans” of evidence invalidating the catastrophic anthropogenic global warming hypothesis (CAGW)

Really enjoyed Bob Carter’s talk. The torpedoes have been replaced with black swans, but the message the same: that the CAGW hypothesis is bollocks. There is no tropospheric hotspot. The earth is always both warming and cooling depending on what timeframe you’re using. Never mind causation, there ain’t even correlation between rising CO2 and temperature. He also mentioned a proxy which uses leaves (or pine needles possibly?) whose abundance on the tree inversely correlates with CO2 levels (more CO2 = less leaves), hence are an excellent proxy for historical CO2 – all very interesting stuff.

...